The trouble with VIT

You’ve gotta hand it to the Victorian Institute of Teaching, the compulsory union you’ve got when you haven’t got a compulsory union, although unions represent their constituents, not over-regulate them.

When it was first established I was hopeful it would represent the professional voice of teachers in Victoria: advocate for teachers, put the teacher perspective in the education debate, advice and support the profession, perhaps a bit like the AMA?

That hasn’t been what’s eventuated. What’s eventuated is an institute that regulates the profession, that administers, that supervises, that over-supervises, that licenses and regulates and charges fees. An annual fee, in fact, to maintain your teaching licence.

Maybe I’m over-sensitive, but look at the language in this letter (below) Victorian teachers received this week: ‘It is important that only you complete this form’, ‘follow the instructions on the form’, ‘the Institute will not able to process an incomplete application form’, ‘registration cannot be renewed…’ etc. Does it sound like the VIT are talking to their constituents? It was accompanied by two densely printed pages of notes mainly related to what teachers need to do to remain … teachers. And of education? Not a whisper.


One thought on “The trouble with VIT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s